Corona’s (not so) secret account


 

The crown's dollars

 

I expected Annabelle Tiongson, manager of the Katipunan Branch of PSBank, to do as she did. Why shouldn’t she? As Niñez Cacho-Olivarez reported, the bank document that formed the basis for the prosecutors to subpoena Chief Justice Renato Corona’s dollar account at PS Bank came from Tiongson herself. Had the Senate ignored the court ruling enjoining the opening of this dollar account, Tiongson would have been the Clarissa Ocampo of this impeachment trial. But because the Senate honored the Court ruling, the best course of action for her was to deny its authenticity.But should the nation believe her hook, line and sinker?

Of course not. To begin with, no less than Corona, by seeking an order from his colleagues at the Supreme Court to restrain the opening of his dollar account, has himself admitted that the said exists. If it is but a figment of the prosecution’s imagination, as the defense would want us to believe, what is there to be restrained by the Court? Any which way, the mysterious dollar deposit works in favor of the prosecution, and courtesy of the CJ’s actuations at that.

There is  a presumption in our rules of evidence that he who suppresses the presentation of evidence does so because it is against him. Here, the chief justice’s insistence on secrecy can only be because the existence of the dollar account will prove anew that he failed to declare his dollar deposit in his SALN.

In any case, the PSBank dollar account is only icing for the prosecution. What is undeniable now is that Corona did not declare a total amount of P31 million cash in his SALN. The defense insists that SALNs are subject to correction. Cuevas should tell that to the court interpreter in a Regional Trial Court in Davao who was fired because he failed to declare in his SALN a market stall. Said the Court “We have repeatedly held that although every office in the government service is a public trust, no position exacts a greater demand for moral righteousness and uprightness from an individual than in the Judiciary x x x Personnel in the Judiciary should conduct themselves in such a manner as to be beyond reproach and suspicion, and free from any appearance of impropriety in their personal behavior, not only in the discharge of their official duties but also in their everyday life. They are strictly mandated to maintain good moral character at all times and to observe irreproachable behavior so as not to outrage public decency.”

I guess Corona believes that the high ethical standards can only be demanded from lowly court employees and not from the Chief Justice himself.  It is obvious that in Corona’s mind, being primus inter pares, or the first amongst equals, is tantamount to a shield of immunity even for criminal acts.

And lest we forget, the undeclared 31 million in cash is over and above the real estate property that he also failed to declare in his SALN. There were at least three pieces of real estate property that he failed to declare: a condominium unit in Spanish Bay Tower, another unit in Makati at the Columns, and a lot in McKinley Hills. There too is the undervaluation of the Bellagio unit by at least 24 million pesos. Altogether, Corona, the Honorable magistrate, did not declare a total of at least P65 million worth of property.

The question is why. Well, the sage and statesman Jovito Salonga, when he wrote the law requiring the filing of truthful SALNs, knew that property which is not proportional to a public official’s salary is presumed ill-gotten under another statute, the unexplained wealth act. Need we say more?

Perhaps Corona should heed the ruling of his own Court. In another ruling ordering the dismissal of a regional revenue officer for failing to disclose two cars in his SALN, the court said: “(T)he SSAL (sworn statement of assets and liabilities) is not a mere scrap of paper. The law requires that the SSAL must be accomplished as truthfully, as detailed and as accurately as possible  x x x  It serves as the basis of the government and the people in monitoring the income and lifestyle of officials and employees in the government.”

 

Top

About these ads

5 comments on “Corona’s (not so) secret account

  1. 0l2geder says:

    Truly indeed Atty Harry….CJ (& d rest of the corrupts out there) has turned into a chronic liar. He does not know now or smell himself as a stinking menace to society. Holy Week is approaching and he can really be a Judas who sold his country for several millions of pesos and other currencies hidden beneath FM’s FCDU RA 6426 which was designed to pool foreign exchange in time of his looting of country’s coffers.

  2. ricky a. pollo says:

    yeah right. Me thinks prosecution should now rests its case having proven that 65 million in the accounts of Corona is nowhere indicated in the SALN of the Chief magistrate. Doubts hanging over the heads of the Impeachment Court, we should now ask senate to rule on whether or not Corona be impeached for this reason alone. I pity the defense panel, they now appear to be lost of words and logic in continually defending Corona. Its like defending Mayor Sanchez of Caluaun the rapist for canonization. Certainly, we should stop senators from asking too much questions on collateral matters of whether the index of speciment of Corona signature with PS Bank is genuine or not. Thats not the issue man. Nor the evidence for the prosecution as ululated by the defense. That is just the impetus that triggers the opening of the accounts. The accounts per se and the testimony of black dyed haired Garcia of PS Bank are the evidence for the people to convict COrona. One thing to worry, the petition of Corona was assigned to Villarma his troupe mate in the first division together with del castillo. This is a ploy. Villara wrote a decision in my case, that I have no right to privaCY OVER MY LETTERS AND FILES STORED the computer in the workplace. Dissented to by Abad, Velasco, Bersamin, de Castro. When in truth he was citing a U.S. CaSE, WHICH REFERS TO PORNOGRAPHY IN THE INTERNET. tHE POINT BEING, vILLARMA CAN WRITE A DUBIOUS DECISION TO FAVOR corona. Prosecution should file a Motion to place on preventive suspension COrona, as he influences the COUrt, on matters concerning him like the tro on dollar deposit. While it is not in the rules of the Senate, it is not prohibited either. Let the senate decide on it. SC cant intervened, as it is an ancillary remedy in connection with any final decision the impeachment court will render in the futoro.

  3. joey says:

    It is critical in our political history that this impeachment trial ends in the manner that it should -the removal of the CJ either through impeachment or involuntary resignation. Without it, we will remain a country where only rich and powerful prevail and are above the law.

  4. Baldo says:

    hari roque jr. for senator

  5. atty. fionelio o. mantilla says:

    With the findings of the impeachment court that respondent, CJ Corona is guilty as charge, we hope all public servants, with no exception be he the head, chief, or even one occupying the highest position in government, should have the conscience to be transparent in the filing of their SALN. Fear must immediately be their basis to walk out of the government service.

    am romy at fom2151@gmail.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s